Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's construction is incredibly thinner and way lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when they were only released with a couple months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better display density. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a battery duration that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's battery life. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with way more MP.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also by far the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.