Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-29 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, having a 90.8 score against 82.7. The Galaxy A51 5G is a a little bit thinner and a little lighter phone than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, even when they were released only 8 months apart. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 5G has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10, so it provides you lots of additional features and better performance.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little bit worse pixel amount per display inch and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G has a much greater storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same video resolution, a same size camera sensor and a 48 mega pixels back-facing camera, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has just a little bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.