Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's score of 81.6. The Galaxy A51 5G construction is lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, although they were only released with a couple months difference. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10, providing you a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A51 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a quite bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 15% bigger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a back-facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution, a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.