Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, with a general score of 90.8 against 82.4. The Galaxy A51 5G is an older and just a bit thicker device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but Samsung could make it a little bit lighter anyway. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit lower pixels density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a bit bigger screen. Galaxy A51 5G features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A51 5G. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G costs more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.