Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-12-27 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A51's 85.5 general score. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with Android 11 OS. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max body is newer and just a little thinner, but much heavier than Samsung Galaxy A51.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A51, because it has a quite better 1284 x 2778px resolution, a little larger display and a just a little higher pixel count per inch of screen. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a better CPU than Galaxy A51, because although it has lesser processing cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 takes much better pictures and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a much tinier diafragm aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit better battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has a 4352mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A51, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A51. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy A51, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.