Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-27 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A51, having a global score of 88.1 against 85.5. Although the iPhone X is a lot older and a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A51, it's design is still just a little bit thinner. The iPhone X counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution.
Apple iPhone X features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A51, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Samsung Galaxy A51 features a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A51 captures much clearer photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a back camera with way more mega pixels and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A51 features a very superior battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A51, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A51. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone X, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A51, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.