Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-27 | 2018-10-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than Asus ROG Phone, getting a overall score of 85.5 against 77.1. Samsung Galaxy A51 is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a bit thinner and lighter than the Asus ROG Phone. The Asus ROG Phone features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A51, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a just a bit lower pixel number in each inch of display.
Asus ROG Phone features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Asus ROG Phone also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A51 counts with a lot better camera than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Asus ROG Phone counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A51, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Asus ROG Phone features a battery duration that is just as good as the Galaxy A51 one.
Galaxy A51 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.