Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-27 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s 82.2 score. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much powerful processor than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A51 has a sharper screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy A51 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features better battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, they both have a back camera with a 48 MP resolution and the same 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.