Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-27 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black and Epi Green |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 405 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is better than the Honor Magic 6 Pro's 76.6 overall score. The Galaxy A51 is a thinner and notably lighter cellphone than the Honor Magic 6 Pro. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version while Honor Magic 6 Pro has Android 14.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A51, because it has a quite higher number of pixels in each display inch, a slightly higher 1280 x 2800 resolution and a bit bigger screen. Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A51, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity. Honor Magic 6 Pro has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same video quality, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much larger camera aperture for better low light captures and video, a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.