Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a bit better than the HTC One M9, having a score of 85.5 against 77.7. Samsung Galaxy A51's construction is extremely newer and somewhat thinner, but a little bit heavier than the HTC One M9. Both devices we are comparing here use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 has the newer 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it provides a lot of extra features and performance tweaks.
The HTC One M9 has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better amount of pixels in each screen inch. The Galaxy A51 has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The HTC One M9 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A51, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processor and a GPU. Galaxy A51 has a much better battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
Galaxy A51 counts with a superior camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 also has a much more mega pixels camera, a bigger camera aperture and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 costs a lot more than HTC One M9, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.