Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2023-05-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.56 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Coffee Black and Snow White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SM7450-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 644 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is a bit better than HTC U23 Pro, with a score of 85.5 against 77.8. Galaxy A51 is an a lot older cellphone than the HTC U23 Pro, but Samsung could make it somewhat lighter and thinner. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version and HTC U23 Pro has Android 13.
Galaxy A51 has a very superior hardware performance than HTC U23 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy A51 has a bit sharper screen than HTC U23 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A51 has slightly more memory to store more apps and games than HTC U23 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 captures a lot better photographs and videos than HTC U23 Pro, although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega pixels.
The HTC U23 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.