Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-27 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is slightly better than LG G8S ThinQ's overall score of 82.5. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version while LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy A51's body has the same thickness than LG G8S ThinQ, but it's just a little lighter.
LG G8S ThinQ has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G8S ThinQ also has more RAM. LG G8S ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit lower pixels density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2248 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a superior camera than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera. The LG G8S ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8S ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a little longer battery duration than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.