Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than the LG K52, having a general score of 85.5 against 76. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A51 is older than LG K52, it's body is just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 has a more recent 11 version and LG K52 has Android 10, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and better performance.
LG K52's processor is very similar to the Galaxy A51 one, they have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM. Galaxy A51 counts with a more vivid screen than LG K52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a way better display pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a superior camera than LG K52, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, and they both have a 0.5 inches sensor and a same resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
LG K52 has a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG K52's battery duration is just as good as the Galaxy A51 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.