Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Sky Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than the LG K62's score of 78.2. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has a newer 11 version and LG K62 has Android 10, so it provides some additional features. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy A51 is older than the LG K62, it's design is just a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner.
The LG K62's processing unit is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A51's CPU, both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy A51 has a brighter display than LG K62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and much more pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A51 shoots much better videos and photos than LG K62, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size and the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a way better (4K) video definition.
The LG K62 features a very superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG K62 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K62's battery performance is very similar to the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy A51.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.