Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Titan gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is slightly better than the LG K92, getting an 85.5 score against 85.4. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy A51 is older than the LG K92, it's design is a little thinner and lighter. These phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A51 has newer 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10, counting with a couple additional features and performance optimizations.
Galaxy A51 features a little bit better processing power than LG K92, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy A51 counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a little greater number of pixels per screen inch.
The LG K92 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG K92 also has a much better resolution camera in the back and a bigger aperture. The LG K92 features a much bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy A51, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG K92 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG K92's battery duration is just as good as the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy A51.
The Galaxy A51 is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.