Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Mirror black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is just a bit better than LG Q70, getting an 85.5 score against 77.9. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has a newer 11 version while LG Q70 has Android 10, providing you some nice extra features and performance improvements. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a somewhat lighter and a little thinner device than LG Q70, although they were released only 4 months apart.
The Galaxy A51 has a bit sharper screen than LG Q70, because it has a little bit greater display pixels density, a bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. LG Q70 features a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A51, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has just a little better hardware performance than LG Q70. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and 4 GB of RAM. The LG Q70 and Samsung Galaxy A51 count with extremely similar batteries duration. The Galaxy A51 takes just a bit better photos and videos than LG Q70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A51 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.