Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Holographic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is much better than LG Stylo 6's 76.7 global score. The Galaxy A51 is a noticeably lighter and just a bit thinner device than LG Stylo 6, although they were only released 5 months apart. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 has a newer 11 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10.
LG Stylo 6 has a processor that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A51 one, both have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. LG Stylo 6 and Galaxy A51 both have incredibly similar screens, because although the LG Stylo 6 has a just a bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a bit larger screen.
The LG Stylo 6 features a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A51, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A51 captures greater photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a back camera with way more megapixels and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
LG Stylo 6 and Samsung Galaxy A51 count with quite similar batteries duration.
The Galaxy A51 costs more money than LG Stylo 6, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.