Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is a bit better than LG V10's general score of 78.6. Galaxy A51's construction is a lot newer, somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than the LG V10. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 has the newer 11 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, counting with a couple nice extra features and performance improvements.
The Galaxy A51 features a faster CPU than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy A51 also has a larger number of cores. The LG V10 features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A51, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels count per inch of display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The LG V10 has a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A51, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A51 features just a bit better camera than LG V10, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy A51 counts with superior battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy A51 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.