Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a global score of 87.6, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A51's 85.5 general score. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is somewhat thicker and a lot heavier than Samsung Galaxy A51. These phones use the same Android 11 operating system. The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG V60 ThinQ and Galaxy A51 feature incredibly similar screens, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a little bit lower count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a quite bigger display. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a superior camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a smaller camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video and a much worse video quality.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs more than the Galaxy A51, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A51. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Galaxy A51, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.