Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a general score of 91.2, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A51's score of 85.5. These phones include Android operating system, but the LG Wing has 10 version while Galaxy A51 has Android 11. The LG Wing is a newer phone than Galaxy A51, but it's extremely thicker and way heavier. The LG Wing counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has 4 GB more RAM.
LG Wing has a screen that's very similar to the display in Samsung Galaxy A51, because although the LG Wing has a quite worse pixel quantity in each screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a little bigger display. LG Wing features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same video quality, the LG Wing also has a larger camera aperture, faster video frame rates, a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
LG Wing counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A51, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage. LG Wing features a battery lifetime that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A51 one.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A51, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A51. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the LG Wing, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A51, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.