Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Mineral Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge (2022), getting an 85.5 score against 84.7. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12 version. Even though the Galaxy A51 is older and a little heavier than the Motorola Edge (2022), it's body is still a bit thinner.
Motorola Edge (2022) has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Edge (2022) and Samsung Galaxy A51 count with incredibly similar screens, because although the Motorola Edge (2022) has a quite inferior pixel quantity per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little larger display.
Motorola Edge (2022)'s camera is very similar to the camera in Galaxy A51, and although the Motorola Edge (2022) has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video, better video frame rates and a camera in the back with more megapixels, they both have the same (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A51 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge (2022) features superior battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A51 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.