Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge (2024), having a score of 85.5 against 78.5. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has older 11 version and Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy A51 is much older than the Motorola Edge (2024), it's body is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner.
The Motorola Edge (2024) has a brighter display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a quite lower screen density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a little larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A51 has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 shoots better videos and photos than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a way smaller camera sensor, a camera in the back with lesser mega pixels resolution, a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video.
The Motorola Edge (2024) counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Galaxy A51 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.