Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having an 85.5 score against 78.5. These phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version. Although it's the best in our current comparison, we must tell that it's also a way older, just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker device.
Galaxy A51 features a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A51. They have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the same count of pixels per inch in the screen and a screen of the same size.
The Galaxy A51 has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 10% larger battery size.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a better resolution camera, a lot larger camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos, a larger diafragm aperture and a much better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.