Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, having an 85.5 score against 83.1. The Galaxy A51 body has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, but it is a bit heavier. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy A51 and Motorola Edge 30 Neo have really similar processing units, and although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy A51 and the Motorola Edge 30 Neo have very similar displays, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bit higher screen density.
The Galaxy A51 has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A51 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo features a battery duration that's just as good as the battery duration in Samsung Galaxy A51, although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has a 4020mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Galaxy A51 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a camera with lot less mega-pixels and a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.