Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having an 85.5 score against 80.9. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A51 is extremely older than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, it's design is a little bit thinner and lighter.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little lower amount of pixels per screen inch, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a quite bigger display. Galaxy A51 features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy A51 counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A51 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A51, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light environments, a lot better video resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures and videos and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.