Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than Motorola Edge 40, having an 85.5 score against 77.2. Even being the best we compare here, Samsung Galaxy A51 is a notably older, just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier phone than Motorola Edge 40. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13.
Galaxy A51 counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 40, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51. Both have a display with the same size, the same screen density and the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Motorola Edge 40 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a camera in the back with more mega-pixels, a way bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a way bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 10% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.