Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's global score of 83.4. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version. Samsung Galaxy A51's construction is a little bit thinner and lighter than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a just a little lower pixel quantity in each inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a better camera than Galaxy A51, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger aperture for better low light images and videos, a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 15 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.