Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with a overall score of 85.5 against 81.9. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14. Galaxy A51 is an a lot older and just a little bit heavier device than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but Samsung managed to make it a little thinner anyway.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much sharper display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixel density and a little higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy A51 features a little bit better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a camera in the back with more mega pixels, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in low light situations and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.