Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-27 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024)'s general score of 78.9. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has Android 14 version. Galaxy A51 counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a little higher display pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A51 counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy A51 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a way lower (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with a lower 48 MP resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) features just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.