Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A51, having a overall score of 86.3 against 85.5. Although Motorola Edge 50 Pro is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy A51, it is just a bit heavier and just a little thicker. These devices use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A51 has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little lower count of pixels per display inch, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a bit larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a back camera with a higher 50 megapixels resolution, a way larger aperture for better photography and videos in low light situations and a lot bigger camera sensor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.