Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A51's score of 85.5. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is newer, but just a little bit thicker and heavier than Galaxy A51. These phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while Galaxy A51 has Android 11.
The Galaxy A51 has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little lower display density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a bit larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much larger back camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality, a back camera with a better resolution, better video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much greater storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.