Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G 5G's 81.5 score. Samsung Galaxy A51 is an older cellphone than the Motorola Moto G 5G, but Samsung made it lighter and way thinner. These phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version and Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10, so it offers a couple additional features and optimized performance.
Galaxy A51 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy A51 has just a bit more memory to store more apps and games than Moto G 5G, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G 5G. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The Moto G 5G counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 25% larger battery size. Galaxy A51 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto G 5G, although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited situations, they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video resolution and a same resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.