Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Surfing blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 overall score. The Galaxy A51 body is somewhat lighter and thinner than Moto G 5G Plus, even when both were only released with a couple months difference. Samsung Galaxy A51 and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus both feature extremely similar screens, although the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a little bit bigger screen, a quite higher pixel density and a slightly better 1080 x 2520 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Moto G 5G Plus has a processing unit that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A51 one, both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with better battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Moto G 5G Plus's camera is just as good as the camera in Samsung Galaxy A51, and although the Moto G 5G Plus has a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments, they both have a 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a 0.5 inches sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.