Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is better than the Moto G Power's score of 76.1. The Galaxy A51 design is somewhat lighter and thinner than Moto G Power, although both were only released with a couple of months difference. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding OS features.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto G Power, because it has a just a bit greater pixel density, a little bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Samsung Galaxy A51 features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G Power. Both have a 4 GB RAM and 8 processing cores. Motorola Moto G Power has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A51 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a way bigger sensor and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Galaxy A51 is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Power, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.