Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), with an 85.5 score against 76. The Galaxy A51 design is thinner and lighter than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), even though it was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version and Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a little sharper screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a bit better pixel count in each inch in the screen. Galaxy A51 counts with a very superior processing unit than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features a slightly better camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a worse video quality, a camera in the back with less megapixels and a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting images and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features superior battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.