Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is a little bit better than Galaxy A51, with an 86.2 score against 85.5. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding operating system features. The Moto G200 5G design is newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy A51.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features a display that's very similar to the display in Galaxy A51, because although the Motorola Moto G200 5G has a just a little lower pixel number per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a little larger screen. The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has more RAM.
The Moto G200 5G takes clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G200 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Galaxy A51 features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with longer battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.