Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G51 5G, with an 85.5 score against 77.8. The Galaxy A51 is an older phone than Motorola Moto G51 5G, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Both devices in this review use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should count with the same OS features.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a little bit better looking display than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a quite better display pixels density. The Galaxy A51 counts with a little faster CPU than Moto G51 5G. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower 48 mega-pixels resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Galaxy A51 features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A51 also has 128 GB internal storage. Moto G51 5G counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.