Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-27 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is just a bit better than Moto G60s, having a score of 85.5 against 79.9. Samsung Galaxy A51 is a thinner and lighter phone than Moto G60s. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should provide identical OS features. The Galaxy A51 features just a little better processing power than Moto G60s. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a little sharper screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater amount of pixels in each inch in the display. Galaxy A51 features a bit better camera than Moto G60s, although it has a back facing camera with a much worse 48 megapixels resolution, a worse video resolution and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures.
Moto G60s features just a bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A51, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto G60s also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Moto G60s has superior battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.