Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, getting an 85.5 score against 76. The Galaxy A51 is a thinner and lighter phone than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, although both were released only a couple of months apart. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 has the newer 11 version while Motorola Moto G8 Power has Android 10, providing you lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy A51 features a bit better CPU than Moto G8 Power. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy A51 has a bit better display than Moto G8 Power, because it has a little bit greater pixel density, a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit larger display.
Galaxy A51 features much more memory to install applications and games than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A51 also has 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a superior camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
Motorola Moto G8 Power has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 costs more than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.