Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is just a bit better than Moto G84, with an 85.5 score against 80.9. These devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 has older 11 version and Moto G84 has Android 13. The Moto G84 features a more vivid display than Galaxy A51. Both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, a same size display and the same amount of pixels in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a very superior CPU than Moto G84, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Moto G84, because although it has a much smaller sensor, a worse resolution back facing camera and a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Moto G84 features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.