Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G9 Power's score of 78.6. The Galaxy A51 construction is way lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G9 Power, even though it was released around 11 months before. Both devices in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 has 11 version while Motorola Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version.
Galaxy A51 counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto G9 Power. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a much better looking screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a way better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Galaxy A51 and Moto G9 Power have very similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB and the same internal storage capacity. Moto G9 Power counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photos and a back-facing camera with much less MP, it also counts with a much better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.