Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-12-27 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, having a score of 85.5 against 75.8. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 has older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Even though Galaxy A51 is noticeably newer than Motorola Moto Z Force, it's a little heavier and a little bit thicker.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has more processing cores. Moto Z Force has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Moto Z Force counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A51 features a better camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking images and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 costs a bit more than Motorola Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.