Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-27 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's score of 77.4. The Galaxy A51 body is noticeably newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it's heavier and incredibly thicker. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A51. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels count in each display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a very superior camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a F2 diafragm aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much better battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.