Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-27 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is a bit better than Motorola One 5G Ace's 81.6 overall score. The Galaxy A51 construction is thinner and lighter than the Motorola One 5G Ace, despite of the fact that it was released around 13 months before. Galaxy A51 counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a just a bit higher screen pixels density.
The Galaxy A51 features a little bit better processing power than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A51 shoots clearer pictures and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a same resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy A51 has a slightly better storage to install applications and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy A51 is also by far the cheapest, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.