Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is just a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, having a overall score of 85.5 against 79.8. The Galaxy A51 construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than Motorola One Hyper, even when both of them were released with only a few months difference. Both devices in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The Galaxy A51 features a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a bit sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 and Motorola One Hyper have quite similar batteries.
Galaxy A51 features a little bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a way less megapixels back facing camera, a tinier aperture and a worse video resolution.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy A51 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.