Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-27 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is slightly better than Motorola One Vision, getting an 85.5 score against 80.7. The Samsung Galaxy A51 construction is just a little thinner and a little lighter than the Motorola One Vision, even when both were only released 8 months apart. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Vision. Both have 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2520px resolution and a just a bit better number of pixels per screen inch. The Motorola One Vision and Galaxy A51 feature very similar storage capacity to store more apps and games, they have an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB and the same 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A51 features just a bit better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The Motorola One Vision features a camera that's very similar to the Galaxy A51 one, and although the Motorola One Vision has a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments, they both have a 0.5 inches camera sensor, a 48 MP back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.