Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2022)'s 81.1 general score. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has older 11 version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12. The Galaxy A51 body is somewhat lighter than the Motorola razr (2022), but it's just a little bit thicker and was released 3 years before.
Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little inferior pixels number in each inch in the display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a little bit larger display.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A51 features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A51 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features just a little better battery performance than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh. The Galaxy A51 features just a bit better camera than Motorola razr (2022), although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photos in low light situations, a back camera with a lower resolution and a lower (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.