Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than the Nokia XR20's 80.8 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is an older phone than Nokia XR20, but it's much lighter and extremely thinner anyway. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features.
Nokia XR20 counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a little bigger screen. Nokia XR20 counts with as much storage capacity for games and applications as the Galaxy A51, both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Nokia XR20, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A51 features a slightly better camera than Nokia XR20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have a same resolution camera, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Galaxy A51 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.