Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-27 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Cyber shade |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy A51 has older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy A51 is a thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3S, even when both of them were released with only a couple months difference.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a display that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A51 one, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite larger display. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A51 has a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3S takes slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same resolution back camera and the same camera sensor size, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much higher video definition and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features longer battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A51 is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.