Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-27 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Ocean |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is slightly better than OPPO Find X2, with a global score of 85.5 against 79.7. Galaxy A51 is a just a little lighter cellphone than OPPO Find X2, but they have the same thickness. Both devices we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has 11 version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version, so it gives you some extra features.
OPPO Find X2 has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a greater pixels amount in each display inch, a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a bit larger display.
The Galaxy A51 has a little bit better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
The OPPO Find X2 has a bit better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same back camera sensor size, a same resolution back facing camera and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and video and better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.